Baptism anatomized:
being propounded in five queries, viz. I. What water-baptism is? II. What is the end for which it was instituted? III. What giveth right to it? IV. Who are the true administrators of it? V. Whether it be lawful for a man to baptize himself? Wherein the right that the infants of believers have to water-baptism is vindicated, the duty of believing parents in that matter, asserted, and that by the contrary tenet and practise, they ought themselves to be excluded from the Lords Supper, is plainly and fully proved ...

APA Citation

Wall, T., Baptism Controversy Collection (Princeton Theological Seminary). (1691). Baptism anatomized: being propounded in five queries, viz. I. What water-baptism is? II. What is the end for which it was instituted? III. What giveth right to it? IV. Who are the true administrators of it? V. Whether it be lawful for a man to baptize himself? Wherein the right that the infants of believers have to water-baptism is vindicated, the duty of believing parents in that matter, asserted, and that by the contrary tenet and practise, they ought themselves to be excluded from the Lords Supper, is plainly and fully proved ... London: Printed by G. Croom, for W. Miller.

MLA Citation

Wall, Thomas, and Baptism Controversy Collection (Princeton Theological Seminary). Baptism Anatomized: Being Propounded In Five Queries, Viz. I. What Water-baptism Is? II. What Is the End for Which it Was Instituted? III. What Giveth Right to It? IV. Who Are the True Administrators of It? V. Whether it Be Lawful for a Man to Baptize Himself? Wherein the Right That the Infants of Believers Have to Water-baptism Is Vindicated, the Duty of Believing Parents In That Matter, Asserted, And That by the Contrary Tenet And Practise, They Ought Themselves to Be Excluded From the Lords Supper, Is Plainly And Fully Proved ... London: Printed by G. Croom, for W. Miller, 1691.