Long Way, Long Time: Learning and Living Aboriginal Culture in Tasmania

LDR 03521nam a22003613u 4500
001 100664316
003 MiAaHDL
005 20231111000000.0
006 m d
007 cr bn ---auaua
007 cr||n|||||||||
008 090618s2014 miu sb 000 0 eng d
035 ⊔ ⊔ ‡a(MiU)990135796290106381
035 ⊔ ⊔ ‡asdr-miu.990135796290106381
035 ⊔ ⊔ ‡z(MiU)MIU01000000000000013579629-goog
035 ⊔ ⊔ ‡a(DBlue)diss 108803
035 ⊔ ⊔ ‡z(MiU)Aleph013579629
040 ⊔ ⊔ ‡aMiU ‡cMiU
042 ⊔ ⊔ ‡adc
100 1 ⊔ ‡aBerk, Christopher D.
245 1 0 ‡aLong Way, Long Time: Learning and Living Aboriginal Culture in Tasmania ‡h[electronic resource].
260 ⊔ ⊔ ‡c2014.
502 ⊔ ⊔ ‡aDissertation (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan. PhD
504 ⊔ ⊔ ‡aIncludes bibliographical references.
520 3 ⊔ ‡aand separations. This “gap-work” highlights the continuity between the ancestors and today’s community. I argue many of these connections are compensatory; they compensate for gaps that cannot be closed. Alternatively, they highlight the productivity of disjuncture in the formation of emergent meanings and identities. All this work, through revitalization programs and other avenues, is informed by post-settlement identities shaped on the Bass Strait Islands and Tasmania proper. The present and the past connect and interact in compelling ways, defining contemporary Tasmanian Aboriginality in a dialectical manner.
520 3 ⊔ ‡arace in popular conceptions of indigeneity. I contend that, in Aboriginal Tasmania at least, racial purity is secondary to geographical and familial ties in the comparative evaluation of community status and social esteem. Next, I examine the ways in which the Tasmanian Aboriginal people have revived many elements of their “lost” culture, including material culture production (basketry, bark canoes, kelp water carriers, etc.) and language. The investigation of these processes of cultural revitalization, and how they interact with post-colonial and “unbroken” traditions, provides a valuable lens through which common understandings of continuity and hybridity are challenged and complicated. These articulations, and the ways in which they are formatted for public consumption in museum exhibits, heritage campaigns, and education programs, are emblematic of broader efforts to form connections in the face of notable gaps
520 3 ⊔ ‡aThis dissertation focuses on the history and culture of the Tasmanian Aboriginal people. Specifically, it addresses the intricate relationship between disjuncture, cultural revitalization, public presentation, and legitimation. Historically presented as “Paleolithic Man” by prominent theorists like Charles Darwin and Edward Burnett Tylor, the Tasmanians were conceptualized as the “rudest” culture ever documented. They became an iconic case of savagery extinguished in the name of progress following their perceived extinction in 1876. Despite this powerful narrative of disappearance, the Tasmanian Aboriginal people have long been at the forefront of indigenous rights movements in Australia. My dissertation strives to explain why this is so. After analyzing the place of the Tasmanian Aboriginal people in social thought, I proceed to challenge the centrality of
538 ⊔ ⊔ ‡aMode of access: Internet.
650 ⊔ 4 ‡aCultural Revitalization.
650 ⊔ 4 ‡aIndigeneity.
650 ⊔ 4 ‡aAustralia.
650 ⊔ 4 ‡aSettler Colonialism.
650 ⊔ 4 ‡aMuseum Studies.
690 ⊔ 4 ‡aAnthropology.
710 2 ⊔ ‡aUniversity of Michigan. ‡bLibrary. ‡bDeep Blue.
899 ⊔ ⊔ ‡a39015089706058
CID ⊔ ⊔ ‡a100664316
DAT 0 ⊔ ‡a20231111015451.0 ‡b20231111000000.0
DAT 1 ⊔ ‡a20231112060855.0 ‡b2023-11-12T14:50:08Z
DAT 2 ⊔ ‡a2019-11-08T19:00:03Z ‡b2015-09-10T20:00:03Z
CAT ⊔ ⊔ ‡aSDR-MIU ‡cmiu ‡dALMA ‡lprepare.pl-004-008
FMT ⊔ ⊔ ‡aBK
HOL ⊔ ⊔ ‡0sdr-miu.990135796290106381 ‡aMiU ‡bSDR ‡cMIU ‡f013579629 ‡pmdp.39015089706058 ‡sMIU ‡1990135796290106381
974 ⊔ ⊔ ‡bMIU ‡cMIU ‡d20231112 ‡sgoogle ‡umdp.39015089706058 ‡y2014 ‡ric ‡qbib ‡tUS bib date1 >= 1929