You're searching in All Fields for all items.

Arguments of the Hon. Edward Stanly of counsel for the receiver, and T.W. Park, Esq., of counsel for Alvin Adams, with the charge of the court, at the trial of Alfred A. Cohen on a charge of embezzlement in the case of Adams & Co., by H.M. Naglee, Receiver, versus Alfred A. Cohen, in the district court of the Fourth Judicial District of the State of California, Hon. John S. Hager, presiding, March, 1856.

APA Citation

Stanly, E., Cohen, A. A. (Alfred Andrew)., Naglee, H. M. (Henry Morris)., Park, T. W. (Trenor William)., Adam & Co. (1856). Arguments of the Hon. Edward Stanly of counsel for the receiver, and T.W. Park, Esq., of counsel for Alvin Adams, with the charge of the court, at the trial of Alfred A. Cohen on a charge of embezzlement in the case of Adams & Co., by H.M. Naglee, Receiver, versus Alfred A. Cohen, in the district court of the Fourth Judicial District of the State of California, Hon. John S. Hager, presiding, March, 1856. San Francisco: Whitton, Towne & Co..

MLA Citation

Adam & Co, et al.. Arguments of the Hon. Edward Stanly of Counsel for the Receiver, And T.W. Park, Esq., of Counsel for Alvin Adams, With the Charge of the Court, At the Trial of Alfred A. Cohen On a Charge of Embezzlement In the Case of Adams & Co., by H.M. Naglee, Receiver, Versus Alfred A. Cohen, In the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District of the State of California, Hon. John S. Hager, Presiding, March, 1856. San Francisco: Whitton, Towne & Co., 1856.

Warning: These citations may not always be complete (especially for serials).