A comparative analysis of two capacity restraint assignment models used in Texas

LDR 01450nam a2200409u 4500
001 005514452
003 MiAaHDL
005 20241221000000.0
006 m d
007 cr bn ---auaua
008 070314s1992 xxu f000 0 eng d
035 ‡a(MiU)990055144520106381
035 ‡asdr-miu.990055144520106381
035 ‡z(MiU)MIU01000000000000005514452-goog
035 ‡a(OCoLC)173459787
035 ‡a(umtri)UMTRI 84535
035 ‡z(MiU)Aleph005514452
040 ‡dMiAaUTR ‡dUtOrBLW
088 ‡aFHWA/TX-89/1153-5
100 1 ‡aBenson, J. D.
245 1 0 ‡aA comparative analysis of two capacity restraint assignment models used in Texas.
260 ‡c1992.
300 ‡a87 p. : ‡b3 ref. figs. tables.
336 ‡atext ‡btxt ‡2rdacontent
337 ‡aunmediated ‡bn ‡2rdamedia
338 ‡avolume ‡bnc ‡2rdacarrier
536 ‡b2-10-89-1153
536 ‡aTexas Department of Transportation, Austin
536 ‡aFederal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
538 ‡aMode of access: Internet.
590 ‡aAuthor corporate affiliation: Texas Transportation Institute, College Station
590 ‡aReport covers the period Sept 1989 - Aug 1992
590 ‡aSubject code: SDBFK
590 ‡aSubject code: WNBR
650 7 ‡aTraffic models. ‡2trt
650 7 ‡aTraffic assignment. ‡2trt
650 7 ‡aRoute choice. ‡2trt
650 7 ‡aTraffic Flow Modeling. ‡2umitrist
650 7 ‡aTraffic Assignment/ Route Choice. ‡2umitrist
700 1 ‡aDresser, George B.
899 ‡a39015075193360 ‡bUMTRI
CID ‡a005514452
DAT 0 ‡a20241217190330.0 ‡b20241221000000.0
DAT 1 ‡a20250102141216.0 ‡b2025-01-03T06:21:40Z
DAT 2 ‡a2024-05-24T17:30:02Z
CAT ‡aSDR-MIU ‡cmiu ‡dALMA ‡lprepare.pl-004-008
FMT ‡aBK
HOL ‡0sdr-miu.990055144520106381 ‡aMiU ‡bSDR ‡cMIU ‡f005514452 ‡pmdp.39015075193360 ‡sMIU ‡1990055144520106381
974 ‡bMIU ‡cMIU ‡d20250103 ‡sgoogle ‡umdp.39015075193360 ‡y1992 ‡rpd ‡qbib ‡tUS fed doc