The role of staff attorneys and face-to-face conferencing in non-argument decisionmaking : a view from the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

LDR 01280nam a2200337 a 4500
001 002737653
003 MiAaHDL
005 20221129000000.0
006 m d
007 cr bn ---auaua
008 940120s1989 dcu b f000 0 eng d
035 ‡a(MiU)990027376530106381
035 ‡asdr-miu.990027376530106381
035 ‡asdr-nrlfGLAD117665099-B
035 ‡asdr-pur590775
035 ‡z(MiU)MIU01000000000000002737653-goog
035 ‡a(OCoLC)21348774
035 ‡a(OCoLC)216582918
035 ‡z(MiU)Aleph002737653
040 ‡aYZA ‡cYZA ‡dGPO ‡dUDI ‡dEYM
043 ‡an-us---
074 ‡a743-C-1
086 0 ‡aJu 13.10:89-4 ‡zJu 13.2:At 8/2 ‡zJu 13.2:At 8
090 ‡aKF8870 ‡b.S75 1989
100 1 ‡aStienstra, Donna.
245 1 4 ‡aThe role of staff attorneys and face-to-face conferencing in non-argument decisionmaking : ‡ba view from the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals / ‡cDonna Stienstra and Joe S. Cecil.
260 ‡aWashington, D.C. : ‡bFederal Judicial Center, ‡c1989.
300 ‡av, 67 p. ; ‡c23 cm.
490 0 ‡aFJC-R ; ‡v89-4
504 ‡aIncludes bibliographical references.
538 ‡aMode of access: Internet.
610 1 0 ‡aUnited States. ‡bCourt of Appeals (10th Circuit)
650 0 ‡aOral pleading ‡zUnited States.
650 0 ‡aAppellate procedure ‡zUnited States.
650 0 ‡aJudicial process ‡zUnited States.
700 1 ‡aCecil, Joe S.
710 2 ‡aFederal Judicial Center.
899 ‡a39015033107452
CID ‡a002737653
DAT 0 ‡a19940120000000.0 ‡b20221129000000.0
DAT 1 ‡a20221129060636.0 ‡b2023-07-19T17:45:44Z
CAT ‡aSDR-MIU ‡cmiu ‡dALMA ‡lprepare.pl-004-008
FMT ‡aBK
HOL ‡0sdr-miu.990027376530106381 ‡aMiU ‡bSDR ‡cMIU ‡f002737653 ‡pmdp.39015033107452 ‡sMIU ‡1990027376530106381
974 ‡bMIU ‡cMIU ‡d20230719 ‡sgoogle ‡umdp.39015033107452 ‡y1989 ‡rpd ‡qbib ‡tUS fed doc
974 ‡bUC ‡cNRLF ‡d20230508 ‡sgoogle ‡uuc1.b4178227 ‡y1989 ‡rpd ‡qbib ‡tUS fed doc
974 ‡bPUR ‡cPUR ‡d20240928 ‡sgoogle ‡upur1.32754061205369 ‡y1989 ‡rpd ‡qbib ‡tUS fed doc