Ore flotation, opinion rendered

LDR 01229nam a22002771 4500
001 001525833
003 MiAaHDL
005 20210817000000.0
006 m d
007 cr bn ---auaua
008 890828s1917 pau|||||||||||||||||eng|
010 ⊔ ⊔ ‡ags 18000090
035 ⊔ ⊔ ‡a(MiU)990015258330106381
035 ⊔ ⊔ ‡asdr-miu.990015258330106381
035 ⊔ ⊔ ‡asdr-nnc3001740
035 ⊔ ⊔ ‡a(OCoLC)46686027
035 ⊔ ⊔ ‡a(SAZTEC)138405130
035 ⊔ ⊔ ‡a(CaOTULAS)176517467
035 ⊔ ⊔ ‡z(MiU)Aleph001525833
040 ⊔ ⊔ ‡cSAZTEC
110 2 ⊔ ‡aMinerals separation, limited.
245 1 0 ‡aOre flotation, opinion rendered, ‡cby United States circuit court of appeals and dissenting opinion, Third circuit, cases 2180 and 2181; Minerals separation, limited, vs. Miami copper company.
260 ⊔ ⊔ ‡aPittsburgh? ‡c1917
300 ⊔ ⊔ ‡a[2], 5-59 p. ‡c23cm.
500 ⊔ ⊔ ‡aBook-plate: Robert Neil Dickman.
500 ⊔ ⊔ ‡aContains also the decision of the U. S. Supreme court in the case of Minerals separation, ltd., and Minerals separation American syndicate ltd., vs. Jas. M. Hyde on the validity of U. S. patent no. 835,120 issued to Sulman, Picard and Ballot.
500 ⊔ ⊔ ‡aIssued by the Mellon institute of industrial research.
500 ⊔ ⊔ ‡acover-title
538 ⊔ ⊔ ‡aMode of access: Internet.
650 ⊔ 0 ‡aFlotation.
710 1 ⊔ ‡aUnited States. ‡bCircuit court of appeals.
710 2 ⊔ ‡aMiami copper company.
CID ⊔ ⊔ ‡a001525833
DAT 0 ⊔ ‡a19890828000000.0 ‡b20210817000000.0
DAT 1 ⊔ ‡a20210929140731.0 ‡b2023-04-07T17:50:14Z
CAT ⊔ ⊔ ‡aSDR-MIU ‡dALMA ‡lprepare.pl-004-008
FMT ⊔ ⊔ ‡aBK
HOL ⊔ ⊔ ‡0sdr-miu.990015258330106381 ‡aMiU ‡bSDR ‡cMIU ‡pmdp.39015021273381 ‡sMIU ‡1990015258330106381
974 ⊔ ⊔ ‡bMIU ‡cMIU ‡d20230407 ‡sgoogle ‡umdp.39015021273381 ‡y1917 ‡rpd ‡qbib ‡tUS bib date1 < 1929
974 ⊔ ⊔ ‡bNNC ‡cNNC ‡d20230306 ‡sgoogle ‡unnc1.cu55819559 ‡y1917 ‡rpd ‡qbib ‡tUS bib date1 < 1929