Martin Lawlor et al., plaintiffs in error (defendants below) vs. D.E. Loewe et al. [Martin Fuchs] defendants in error (plaintiffs below) : transcript of record, error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut.
|Main Author:||Lawlor, Martin,|
|Other Authors:||Loewe, Dietrich E., , Fuchs, Martin, efendant in error.|
[Toledo, O. : Toledo Brief and Record Co., printers, 1914]
> United States.
Labor unions > United States.
Monopolies > United States > Cases.
At head of title: ... United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Vols. 2-5 paged continuously.
Cover title: Transcript of record. Supreme Court of the United States. October term, 1913. no. 900 ... Filed February 10, 1914 (24,051).
"In the Danbury hatters' case D.E. Loewe and Company brought suit under the Sherman Anti-trust Act because of a boycott of the company's product, naming as defendants not only the Danbury Local of the Hatters' Union but also the 186 individual members of the local"--Encyc. soc. sci., v. 2, p. 664.
John K. Beach, Frank L. Mulholland, attorneys for plaintiffs in error; Daniel Davenport, Walter Gordon Merritt, attorneys for defendants in error.
5 v. :
|Locate a Print Version:||
Find in a library